<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comeuppance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jejune.net/bits/2011/01/comeuppance-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jejune.net/bits/2011/01/comeuppance-2/</link>
	<description>about nothing in particular since 2000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.jejune.net/bits/2011/01/comeuppance-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jejune.net/bits/?p=5204#comment-5150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny. I&#039;ve never been able to eat those. As a kid we always called them thousand year old eggs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny. I&#8217;ve never been able to eat those. As a kid we always called them thousand year old eggs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbh</title>
		<link>http://www.jejune.net/bits/2011/01/comeuppance-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5148</link>
		<dc:creator>rbh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jejune.net/bits/?p=5204#comment-5148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meat eaters have more culinary choices and flavors available. The moral dimension is interesting. You would expect a religious/moral justification. I guess &#039;Man has dominion over the animals&#039; is it. 

Far as I know, no one in the West ever tried karma as a justification for cruel treatment of animals. Karma is tricky because while it give balance for the good and evil in the world, it doesn&#039;t enhance compassion: whatever ill fortune occurs because you deserve it. There fore animals deserve bad treatment and no compassion: they must have really screwed up to be reborn as a cow or pig. I think that works intellectually, but morally it repulses. I am just surprised no one has tried that tack.

Morals conveniently allow the convenient.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meat eaters have more culinary choices and flavors available. The moral dimension is interesting. You would expect a religious/moral justification. I guess &#8216;Man has dominion over the animals&#8217; is it. </p>
<p>Far as I know, no one in the West ever tried karma as a justification for cruel treatment of animals. Karma is tricky because while it give balance for the good and evil in the world, it doesn&#8217;t enhance compassion: whatever ill fortune occurs because you deserve it. There fore animals deserve bad treatment and no compassion: they must have really screwed up to be reborn as a cow or pig. I think that works intellectually, but morally it repulses. I am just surprised no one has tried that tack.</p>
<p>Morals conveniently allow the convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
